Katie Volk
Arts Editor
Despite high expectations for the star-studded film, “Amsterdam” fails to deliver the high suspense and superb acting that was anticipated for David O. Russell’s most recent film.
“Amsterdam” is set in the 1930’s and three friends—a doctor, a nurse, and an attorney—witness a murder resulting in the three of them being the prime suspects in the murder case. The three eventually must uncover the truth and unsolved the mystery to clear their names.
David O. Russell’s new film features stars such as Christian Bale as Dr. Berendsen, Margot Robbie as Valerie, John David Washington as Harold, Anya Taylor-Joy as Libby, Robert De Niro as Gil, and Taylor Swift as Liz.
Director David O. Russell makes multiple attempts to fit wit, mystery, and suspense into one film. Although his tries are noticeable to viewers, they are often cringe worthy and the lack of satire makes the film less captivating.
The script of the film lacks nuance and creates many uncomfortable moments throughout the film. There are numerous attempts at unironic jokes that do not land and do not give any momutem to the movie at all.
What makes “Amsterdam” unique is its setting. Contrary to the title of the film, it takes place in New York City during 1933. The period piece element creates an atmosphere that is rarely captured in films that take place in the 21st century. The makeup and costumes add to 1930’s vibe that solidifies the film’s essence.
Although “Amsterdam” has a well rounded cast, the dialogue often feels improvised along with a very mediocre plot. There are many attempts in which the actors aim to be amusing, however the genre of comedy does not fit well with actors such as Christian Bale and John David Washington. There would be many awkward pauses after a multitude of jokes, contributing to the awareness of the film.
The lack of chemistry between Valerie and Harold hurts the plot of the movie. The film revolves around friendship, and the relationship between Valerie and Harold is not compelling and as a result, the film becomes less entertaining.
Through the film, Russell intends to communicate that inevitably love triumphs hatred and everyone will revel in the tapestry of life. This extremely trite theme paired with the overused ending results in an unoriginal conclusion which leaves the viewers very unsatisfied.
The pacing of the movie results in a convoluting plot. Due to the film’s lack of rhythm, the film’s coherence suffers. By the time the “Amsterdam” reaches its height in the third act after a series of flashbacks and elongated plot elements, it’s too late to draw the audience’s attention in.
However, Emmanuel Lubezki, the cinematographer for “Amsterdam” salvages any excellent qualities the movie has. The shots and the camera work for the film were extremely impressive, capturing the mystery essence that the film was supposed to have. Lubezki’s usage of lighting and camera angles create realism and naturalism.
Although “Amsterdam” contains a multitude of talented and experienced actors along with beautiful camera work, this is not enough to save the film from David O. Russell’s abundant attempts at comedy, mystery, crime, and drama in one movie.
Leave a Reply